SporeWiki:Taxonomy

From SporeWiki, the knowledge base dedicated to Spore

This is the project page for SporeWiki:Taxonomy. The project's mission is to scientifically catalogue as many Sporian life forms as possible, including both creature and plant specimens.

Contents 1 Participants 2 Going about assigning taxa 2.1 Deviation 3 How to request a scientific classification 4 When is it time to divide a taxon into two? 5 What if two species seem identical? Is there still any reason to separate them? 6 Taxon authority 7 Epithets 7.1 What should I name it?

[edit] Participants

This project is not for wimps. Be wary that cataloguing monsters is no easy task, and neither is cataloguing real life forms! However, if you're willing to take on the challenge, sign up below!

1. Schnautzr 00:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC) -- Started the project, but am hardly active on SW anymore if at all.
2. Neini8 13:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
3. Carenthos 21:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
4. OluapPlayer 12:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
5. SOviraptor18 21:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC) same as Schnautzr
6. UnderdudeX 9:35, 01 August 2008 (UTC)
7. Methyl Orange ^{(contact me)} 13:03, 12 October 2008 (UTC) -- If I am allowed, I'll do cataloguing Maxis content.
8. Verades 00:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
9. Haghog999 08:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
10. SporeExpert 12:49,26 October 2008 (UTC)
11. Pharox 9:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
12. User:UnrealCanine 15:50 4 November 2008 (UTC)
13. Zagorian 22:05 8 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Going about assigning taxa

First do some research on both the alien and any real animals displaying similar characteristics. Start at the kingdom, and carefully assign each daughter taxon in order of heirarchy. If no real life taxon exists that makes sense, consider a made-up one. Try to use the taxa already in SporeWiki instead of creating new ones, when possible. Taxa created in SporeWiki tend to be very broad and cover more species than real ones do, so this shouldn't pose many problems.

[edit] Deviation

SW:TAX deviates from Linnean rules on occasion. For example, Tetrapoda is ignored. This allows mammals, reptiles, and amphibians to have more or less than four limbs. However, note that Primates does keep this rule, as do a few others. The limbs are not the only thing that may barely exclude an organism: Hydrohippus is kept out of the seahorse order, because its jawbones are not fused together, and Stungfish is kept out of the lamprey order, because it has matching fins on either side. If, as in these cases, there is no better match, do not violate the rules of the taxon, but create a sister "pseudo-" taxon.

Technically, every single creature in Spore should be classified as an amniote. Each one has a backbone, reproduces sexually, and hatches from an amniotic egg. Because the egg is always external, non-monotreme mammals and live-bearing reptiles/amphibians/fish are impossible. Invertebrates and simple chordates would be hopeless. The only actual possible creatures would be birds, monotremes, egg-laying reptiles/amphibians/fish, and a bunch of "-oid" type creatures. To compensate, the backbone should only be recognized if it is important to maintain the structure of the organism (if it stands on legs, for example). The amniotic egg should be ignored entirely. Reproduction methods should also be ignored. Do not worry about how many vertebrae an organism has, since this is not really that important.

[edit] How to request a scientific classification

When you create a new organism page, be sure to add {{tax-req}} to the top of its page; this will flag taxonomists so they know this article needs attention.

If not enough information is given to properly classify the organism, a message at the top of the article appears, prompting more information. The template for this message is {{tax-more-info}}.

[edit] When is it time to divide a taxon into two?

When the number of daughter taxa becomes overwhelming. I'd say twenty or so max.

[edit] What if two species seem identical? Is there still any reason to separate them?

Surely there is some subtle difference, such as a bend in the neck or the number of horns. If they are exactly identical, which is highly improbable, it sounds like a case of either plagiarism or misidentification.

[edit] Taxon authority

It is customary to add a reference stating the authority behind the lowest mentioned taxon. For example, a species page needs a species authority, and a phylum page needs a phylum authority. The authority is not the person who discovered the taxon, but the person who first wrote formally about it.

For real-world taxa, consult Wikipedia for the taxon authority. For Spore-only taxa, look at the page history, and use the earliest username (the person who wrote the article, not who created the creature) and year. References should be in this format:

Last name, year of description (four digits)

For example, Animalia should be written: Animalia (Linnaeus, 1758), and Floridata should be written Floridata (Neini8, 2008). Note that Spore-only taxa require linking the name to the user. Also, remember that the person who describes a family is NOT the person who wrote the first article on that species, but rather, the person who first wrote about that particular family as a whole (the first editor of the family page, or consult Wikipedia).

[edit] Epithets

The second part of a species name (for example, in "Homo sapiens", it's "sapiens") is a special part of the species name, because the person who created the creature, not the article, gets to choose whatever name they like. Due to the unlikelihood that this will happen, however, SporeWiki taxonomists often choose this name themselves. HOWEVER, the creator of the creature has every right to change this epithet to whatever word they like, provided it is a single word and is acceptable on SporeWiki. If you are changing an epithet, be sure to change it on the appropriate taxon pages (usually family/genus pages) as well.

[edit] What should I name it?

Whatever you like. Here are a few common sources for names:

1. Special traits unique to the species, such as a distinguishing feature or color (i.e. rhodi for a red creature, longirostris for a creature with a long beak)
2. Personality (i.e. rex for a king, timidus for a timid creature)
3. A person (i.e. doeii for a creature discovered by John Doe, elvispresleya for a creature named after Elvis Presley)
4. The place of discovery (i.e. nabooii for a creature discovered on Naboo)
5. The possibilities are endless!